<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Ethics of Article Spinning</title>
	<link>http://spunwrite-blog.com/2007/06/18/on-the-ethics-of-article-spinning/</link>
	<description>Article marketing, spinning, SEO, and other "stuff" from the creator of SpunWrite.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 01:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Bishop</title>
		<link>http://spunwrite-blog.com/2007/06/18/on-the-ethics-of-article-spinning/#comment-48</link>
		<author>Lynn Bishop</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spunwrite-blog.com/2007/06/18/on-the-ethics-of-article-spinning/#comment-48</guid>
					<description>I've used your service and been thrilled with the resulting spun articles, as I've said twice now, the spun articles are better than the original was.... 
&lt;b&gt;It's True, Google Loves Spun Articles &lt;/b&gt; I've even put the spun articles on the same site as the original, and then respun your articles again, just as an experiment and I got about the same amount of visitors to each of the 5 different but similar pages, just becuase of the slightly different wording. So it does work, definately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used your service and been thrilled with the resulting spun articles, as I&#8217;ve said twice now, the spun articles are better than the original was&#8230;.<br />
<b>It&#8217;s True, Google Loves Spun Articles </b> I&#8217;ve even put the spun articles on the same site as the original, and then respun your articles again, just as an experiment and I got about the same amount of visitors to each of the 5 different but similar pages, just becuase of the slightly different wording. So it does work, definately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Article Spinning</title>
		<link>http://spunwrite-blog.com/2007/06/18/on-the-ethics-of-article-spinning/#comment-56</link>
		<author>Article Spinning</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spunwrite-blog.com/2007/06/18/on-the-ethics-of-article-spinning/#comment-56</guid>
					<description>I agree with you, Paul. Article spinning is indeed VERY POWERFUL, if done right. I once heard someone saying article spinning is for the lazy folks. Well, as strange as it might sound, article spinning is actually for those that are NOT lazy. 

But of course, I am talking about the RIGHT way of spinning your articles. There's the wrong way and the right way. The wrong way is when you just automatically use the synonym replacement aspect of article spinning software to spit out completely unreadable gibberish, in the name of articles. That's just junk and no one can read even one sentence from such junk articles. 

But if you really want to get the best from article spinning, then a great deal of effort is required to put into the original work. By a lot of effort I am talking about investing several hours or even days to get one SEED article or a group of SEED articles rewritten with different phrases, sentences and paragraphs. If done right, just one SEED article can be uniquely spun into hundreds or even thousands of copies that can escape the duplicate content filter!

One of MOST POWERFUL article spinning tools out there that is completely free is &lt;a href="http://www.PlugAndSpin.com" rel="nofollow"&gt; PlugAndSpin Article Spinning Software &lt;/a&gt;. 

Fred Myson
http://www.PlugAndSpin.com

Fred Myson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, Paul. Article spinning is indeed VERY POWERFUL, if done right. I once heard someone saying article spinning is for the lazy folks. Well, as strange as it might sound, article spinning is actually for those that are NOT lazy. </p>
<p>But of course, I am talking about the RIGHT way of spinning your articles. There&#8217;s the wrong way and the right way. The wrong way is when you just automatically use the synonym replacement aspect of article spinning software to spit out completely unreadable gibberish, in the name of articles. That&#8217;s just junk and no one can read even one sentence from such junk articles. </p>
<p>But if you really want to get the best from article spinning, then a great deal of effort is required to put into the original work. By a lot of effort I am talking about investing several hours or even days to get one SEED article or a group of SEED articles rewritten with different phrases, sentences and paragraphs. If done right, just one SEED article can be uniquely spun into hundreds or even thousands of copies that can escape the duplicate content filter!</p>
<p>One of MOST POWERFUL article spinning tools out there that is completely free is <a href="http://www.PlugAndSpin.com" rel="nofollow"> PlugAndSpin Article Spinning Software </a>. </p>
<p>Fred Myson<br />
<a href="http://www.PlugAndSpin.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.PlugAndSpin.com</a></p>
<p>Fred Myson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Brickhouse Sr.</title>
		<link>http://spunwrite-blog.com/2007/06/18/on-the-ethics-of-article-spinning/#comment-74</link>
		<author>Randy Brickhouse Sr.</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spunwrite-blog.com/2007/06/18/on-the-ethics-of-article-spinning/#comment-74</guid>
					<description>I agree with you all about this entire issue, because I have found out that article spinning done right, has helped with my article marketing a great deal. Great content, is still great content.

Thanks and God bless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you all about this entire issue, because I have found out that article spinning done right, has helped with my article marketing a great deal. Great content, is still great content.</p>
<p>Thanks and God bless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

